DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICS TEACHING MATERIALS WITH TRIGONOMETRIC RATIO WITH ADDIE MODEL REVIEWED FROM STUDENTS' LEARNING RESULTS AT PUBLIC SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 TILAMUTA

Authors

  • Nursam S2-Mathematics Education Study Program State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Evi Hulukati S2-Mathematics Education Study Program State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Ismail Djakaria S2-Mathematics Education Study Program State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia

Keywords:

Teaching Materials, Trigonometric Rati, Percentage

Abstract

This study aims to determine (1) the validity of mathematics teaching materials developed with the ADDIE model in terms of student learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 1 Tilamuta, (2) the effectiveness of mathematics teaching materials developed with the model in terms of student learning outcomes at Public Senior High School 1 Tilamuta, (3) students' perceptions of the implementation of mathematics learning by using teaching materials that have been developed with the ADDIE model. This research is a development research using the ADDIE development model. In this study, 5 development steps were carried out, namely Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation. The products produced in this research are teaching materials. The resulting teaching materials are then validated by material and language experts, design experts and students. The results showed that the developed mathematics teaching materials were declared valid based on the results of the validity test on the aspect of the content of the module. In general, the percentage of validity was 84.76% with the criteria of Very Valid, the systematic aspect of the content of the module, the percentage value of the validity was 79.22% and the criteria were valid. In terms of content coverage, the percentage level of validity is 83.33% with very valid criteria and in the contextual approach aspect, the validity level is only 75% but still in the valid category. For the language aspect, the percentage of validity is 84.17% with very valid criteria, the aspect of delivering module content in general has a percentage of 79.26% and is stated with valid criteria, module content design has a percentage of 82.50% with very valid criteria, while for The typeface, font size and illustrations in this teaching material have a percentage of 80% validity and the criteria are included in the valid category. The effectiveness of mathematics teaching materials for trigonometric ratio materials that have been developed, obtained based on the learning outcomes tests given to students, obtained the Classical Learning Completeness Percentage value of 78.70. Based on the criteria with references that have been proposed previously, the percentage of classical learning completeness obtains the criteria of "Good". Furthermore, the N-Gain test was carried out to obtain an N-Gain score = 0.73. The N-Gain value is included in the High category. Students' perceptions of mathematics teaching materials for trigonometric ratios obtained a figure of 82.22% for the level of acceptance of students in the very good category.

References

Achdiyat, M, and R. Utomo. (2018). Numerical Ability and Mathematics Learning Achievement. Formative : Scientific Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, 7 (3)

Aldoobie, Nada. 2015. ADDIE Models. (On line). American International Journal of Contemporary Research. Volume 5 (6). (http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf, Accessed April 6, 2022)

Arikunto, S. 2009. Research Management. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Arshad, Azhar. 2016. Learning Media. Jakarta : Rajawali Press

Azmi. 2017. The Nature of Mathematics Subjects. Accessed April 6, 2022. (Online). https://azmi648.blogspot.com/2017/02/hakikat-mata-peljari-mathematika.html

Directorate of High School Development. (2010). Technical guidelines for developing high school teaching materials. Retrieved on February 20, 2022, from https://teguhsasmitosdp1.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/2-juknis-pengembangan-bahan-ajar-_isi-revisi__0104.pdf

Djamaludin, Ahdar & Wardana. 2019. Study and Learning. Parepare : CV. Kaaffah Learning Center

Dwiyogo, Wasis. 2018. Blended Learning-Based Learning. Depok : Rajawali Press

Hamalik, Oemar. 2007. Teaching and Learning Process. Jakarta : PT. Earth Literature

Language Center. 2012. Big Indonesian Dictionary. Jakarta : Ministry of National Education of Indonesia.

Ministry of Education and Culture. 2014. A copy of the Attachment of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 59 of 2014 concerning the 2013 Curriculum for Senior High Schools/Madrasah Aliyah.

Kosasih, E. 2021. Development of Teaching Materials. Jakarta : Earth Literacy

Kustandi, Cecep and Daddy Darmawan. 2020. Development of Learning Media: Concepts and Applications Development of Learning media for Educators in Schools and Communities. Jakarta : Kencana (Division of Prenadamedia Group)

Mimin, H. 2007. Assessment Models and Techniques at the Education Unit Level. Jakarta: Echoing Persada Press

Muflihah, Ai. 2021. Improving Students' Motivation and Learning Outcomes through the Index Card Match Learning Model in Mathematics Lessons. Indonesian Education Journal. Vol 2 No. 1, 152-160

Nasution, Nurliana et al. 2019. Blended Learning Model Book. Riau : Unilak Press

Nurhairunnisa. 2017. Development of Interactive Teaching Materials to Improve Understanding of Mathematical Concepts in Class X High School Students. Thesis. Not Published. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University.

Nugraha, et al. (2020). Study of the Effect of Online Learning on Grade IV Mathematics Learning Outcomes. Journal of Research Innovation. Vol 1 (3), 265-276

Oliver, J. 2013. Efforts to Improve Activities and Learning Outcomes Measuring Instruments Using Interactive Multimedia for Class X Students at SMK Al-Washiliyah 4 Medan. Journal Of Chdmical Information and Modeling. 53 (9), 1689-1699

Parsa, I Made. 2017. Evaluation of Learning Process and Outcomes. Kupang : CV Rasi Published

Regulation of the Minister of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2006 concerning Content Standards for Primary and Secondary Education Units. 2006.

Rayanto, Yudi Hari & Sugianti. 2020. Research on ADDIE and R2D2 Model Development: Theory and Practice. Pasuruan : Academic & Research Institute

Riduan. 2010. Methods and Techniques for Compiling Thesis. Bandung : Alphabeta

Riduwan. 2013. Measurement Scale of Research Variables. Bandung : Alphabeta

Ropii, Muhammad & Muh. Fahrurrozi. 2017. Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Lombok : University of Hamzanwadi Press

Sugiarta, Awandi Nopyan. 2007. Development of a Collaborative Learning Program Management Model for Independent Street Children in Shelters (Focused Study on Shelters in Bekasi City). Bandung: UPI.

Sundayana, Wachyu. 2017. Review of Curriculum and Learning Planning. Jakarta : Erlangga

Suyanto, and Asep Jihad. 2013. Becoming a Professional Teacher. Jakarta : Erlangga

Tarigan, Rosmini, Rumahorbo, and Matondang. 2020. The Relationship of Learning Styles with Civics Learning Outcomes for Class XI MIA Students at GKPI Private High School Padang Bulang Medan Odd Semester T.A 2020/2021. Journal of Pancasila Education and Kewarnageragaan. Vol 2 (2), 137-144

Widyastuti, And Susiana. 2019. Using the ADDIE Model to develop learning materials for actuarial mathematics. (Online) Journal of Physics : Conference Series. 1188 012052 (https://iopscience.iop.org/article /10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052, Accessed April 6, 2022)

Yubert. 2014. Theory of Learning and Development of Teaching Materials in Education. Bandar Lampung: Raharja's Main Award

Downloads

Published

2022-08-14

How to Cite

Nursam, Evi Hulukati, & Ismail Djakaria. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICS TEACHING MATERIALS WITH TRIGONOMETRIC RATIO WITH ADDIE MODEL REVIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ LEARNING RESULTS AT PUBLIC SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 TILAMUTA. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 3(8), 119-124. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejhea/article/view/2555

Issue

Section

Articles