SPOTLIGHT ON EDUCATORS' VIEWS ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF TEACHING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Fadhil Abdulzahra Tarad Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Al-Qasim Green University, College of Physical Education and Sport Sciences

Keywords:

review, methodology, students

Abstract

The ideas underlying the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) methodology include how students learn a language most effectively, the kind of activities that aid in the learning process, and the responsibilities of both teachers and students. The primary goal is to help students improve their communicative skills, which include speaking and listening, writing, and reading. This review aims to report EFL teachers' views and practices about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), explore the motivations for these beliefs and practices, and identify any discrepancies that may exist. It was found that while most educators held favorable views of CLT's guiding principles, they struggled to implement them in their classrooms. There was a minor discrepancy between teachers' beliefs and their pedagogical methods. This review article highlights teachers' perspectives on CLT to help English instructors, students, and curriculum designers

References

Ansary, D., 2012. Communicative language teaching in EFL context: Teachers attitude and perception in Bangladesh. ASA University Review, 6(1): 61-78.

Chang, M., 2011. EFL teachers’ attitudes toward communicative language teaching in Taiwanese college.

Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 53(5): 17-34.

Galloway, A., 1993. Communicative language teaching: An introduction and sample activities. ERIC clearinghouse on languages and linguistics. Washington DC: ERIC Digest.

Jamali, F., M. Lashgari and N. Yousofi, 2014. Investigating teachers’ attitudes toward CLT. International Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Research, 3(3): 160-164.

Karavas-Doukas, E., 1996. Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitude to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50(3): 187-198.

Larsen-Freeman, D., 2000. Techniques and principles in language teaching. 2nd Edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mai Ngoc, K. and N. Iwashita, 2012. A comparison of learners and teachers’ attitudes toward communicative language teaching at two universities of Vietnam. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 7: 25-49.

Mowlaie, B. and A. Rahimi, 2010. The effect of teachers’ attitude about communicative language teaching on their practice: Do they practice what they preach? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9: 1524- 1528.

Richards, J.C., 2006. Communicative language teaching today. New York: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J.C. and T.D. Rodgers, 2001. Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Saricoban, A. and F.Y. Tilfarlioglu, 1999. Attitudes of foreign language teachers to the communicative learner-centered approach. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 15(15): 61-65.

Zangoie, A. and A. Derakhshan, 2014. The relationship between EFL teachers' preference of corrective feedback and their attitudes towards. CLT. IJALEL, 3(5): 82-90.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-20

How to Cite

Fadhil Abdulzahra Tarad. (2023). SPOTLIGHT ON EDUCATORS’ VIEWS ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF TEACHING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGES. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 4(8), 80-83. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejhea/article/view/3797

Issue

Section

Articles