CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF 1961 VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS

Authors

  • Nwaokonko Department of Political Science, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Hracourt, Rivers State
  • Uchechukwu

Keywords:

Convention, Diplomacy, Relations

Abstract

This paper has critically analyzed the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations in the light of how it has affected the nature of relations amongst States in the international system today. The work basically focused on exploring the articles of the 1961 Vienna Convention with the objectives of finding the strengths, weaknesses, the extent of abuse, response of the United Nations to its abuses, and solutions to make it more meaningful to diplomatic relations amongst States. This work applied Realism theory as it is based on rationality and state-centrism. Hence, what is referred to as diplomatic relations hover around the protection of the interests of a State in relation to other States in the international system. It is the finding of this work that the poor application and interpretation of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations has always caused some conflicts that necessarily demand some befitting solutions. Consequently, this study recommended the employment of diplomats based at all times on merit for us to avoid the pitfall of novices or ill-trained personnel going to disgrace countries abroad; well-balanced and equitable enforcement of the Vienna Conventions in the interest of maintenance of cordial diplomatic relations in the international community; ensuring that diplomats that contravene the conducts stipulated for them by the Convention should be decisively dealt with to deter others; countries that use their embassies in other countries as sources of espionage and other nefarious practices should be punished; there is the need for periodic appraisal of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations to make it be responsive of any emerging issues in diplomatic relations; and the United Nations should show more commitment and ensure that the 1981 Vienna Convention Diplomatic Relations stipulations are enforced on all States for global peace and security

References

Adams, C. F. (2021). Diplomatic relations definition. Retrieved on the 21st of July, 2022 from https://www.yourdictionary.com/diplomatic-relations.

Barker, J. C. (2006). The protection of diplomatic personnel. (1st edn). Ashgate.

Barston, R. P. (2006). Modern diplomacy. Pearson Education.

Bassiouni, M. C. (2008). International criminal law: Multilateral and bilateral enforcement mechanisms. (Vol 2, 3rd edn). Martinus Nijhoff.

Bern, A. (2008). ABC of Diplomacy. Published by Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA) 3003 Bern www.eda.admin.ch. Retrieved on 21st July, 2022 from https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/en/documents/publications/GlossarezurAussenpoliti /ABC-Diplomatie_en.pdf.

Bruns, K. (2014). A cornerstone of modern diplomacy: Britain and the negotiation of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Bloomsbury.

Catholic News Agency (2019). Holy See waives diplomatic immunity for accused Vatican ambassador to France. Catholic News Agency. 8 July 2019.

Chaplais, P. (2003). English diplomatic practice in the middle ages. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Constantinou, C. M. (1996). On the way to diplomacy. University of Minnesota Press.

Cusack, T. R. and Stoll, R. J. (1990). Exploring realpolitik: Probing international relations theory with computer simulation. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Denza, E. (2016). Diplomatic law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. (Fourth edn). Oxford University Press.

Dlamini, K. (2003). Is quiet diplomacy an effective conflict resolution strategy? SA Yearbook of International Affairs.

Duquet, S. and Wouters, J. (2015). Legal duties of diplomats today: The continuing relevance of the Vienna Convention. Working Paper Series No. 146. Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies.

Frey, L. S. and Frey, M. L. (1999). The history of diplomatic immunity. Ohia State University Press.

Gabriel, R. A. (2002). The great armies of antiquity. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Garnett, J. C. (1984). Commonsense and the theory of international politics. Available as a Google eBook at http://www.sunypress.edu/p-112-commonsense-and-the theory-of i.aspx.

Gilpin, R. G. (1986). The richness of the tradition of political realism. In: R. O. Keohane (Ed.), Neo-realism and its critics. Columbia University Press.

Goffman, D. (2001). Negotiating with the renaissance state: The Ottoman Empire and the new diplomacy. In Aksan, V. and Goffman, D. (Eds), The early modern Ottomans: Remapping the empire. Cambridge University Press.

Goodin, R. E. (2010). The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.

Haldon, J. (1999). Warfare, state and society in the Byzantine world, 565–1204. UCL Press.

Jervis, R. (2002). Mutual assured destruction. Foreign Policy (133), pp. 40 42. doi:10.2307/3183553.

Koon, Y. (2012). “The face of diplomacy in 19th-century China: Qiying’s portrait gifts. In Johnson, K. (ed.), Narratives of free trade: The commercial cultures of early US-China relations. Hong Kong University Press.

Loewe, M. and Shaughnessy, E. L. (eds). (1999). The Cambridge history of ancient China: From the origins of civilization to 221 B.C. Cambridge University Press.

McClanahan, G. V. (1989). Diplomatic immunity: Principles, practices, problems. (1st edn). C. Hurst & Co.

Mohammad, F. Y. (2010). Diplomacy, the only legitimate way of conducting international relations. Lulu.

Morgenthau, H. (1973). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. McGraw Hill Higher Education.

Murty, B. S. (1989). The international law of diplomacy: The diplomatic instrument and world public order (1st edn). Martinus Nijhoff.

Rowlands, K. (2012). Decided preponderance at sea: Naval diplomacy in strategic thought. Naval War College Review, 65(4).

Tellis, A. (1995/6). Reconstructing political realism: The long march to scientific theory. Security Studies, 5. In: S. Burchill et al. (Ed.) (2005), Theories of international relations. (Third edition). Palgrave: Macmillan.

Thompson, K. W. (1985). Moralism and morality in politics and diplomacy. University Press of America.

Trager, R. F. (2016). The diplomacy of war and peace. Annual Review of Political Science. 19 (1), pp. 205–228. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051214-100534.

Tutt, A. (2013). E-diplomacy capacities within the EU-27: Small states and social media. www.grin.com. Posted on 23 May 2014. Retrieved on the 21st of July, 2022.

United Nations (2010). Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Audiovisual Library of International Law. Retrieved on the 21st of July, 2022.

University of Nairobi Research Archive (2021). Diplomatic privileges and immunities: A critical analysis of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961). http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/76780.

Winter, J. (ed) (2014). The Cambridge history of the First World War: Volume II. The State, Vol. 2.

Young, E. (1964). The development of the law of diplomatic relations. British yearbook of international law, Vol. 40. Oxford University Press.

Zeller, G. (1961). French diplomacy and foreign policy in their European setting. in The new Cambridge modern history, 5.

Published

2022-08-05

How to Cite

Nwaokonko, & Uchechukwu. (2022). CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF 1961 VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 3(8), 65-73. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejhea/article/view/2540

Issue

Section

Articles