LITERATURE IN ENGLISH STUDIES: A THEORY OF HOW TEACHERS AND STUDENTS WITH THE SUBJECT

Authors

  • Murtdha Ayad Mohammed Dawood Islamic University, Hilla, Babylon, Iraq

Keywords:

Literature curriculum, economic, social, educational

Abstract

There is ambiguity in Singapore's Literature curriculum. A new study on the topic has highlighted this ambiguity and offered ways to rethink it in light of the contemporary environment and the influence of globalization (Choo 2004; Holden 2000; Choo, 2011; Holden, 2000; Choo, 2011; Poon, 2007). Data from Singapore's secondary schools examined literature's role in today's political, economic, social, and educational context. Using in-depth interpretative case studies done at five Singaporean school sites, this research examines students' viewpoints and delivers findings from in-depth interpretive case studies. Focus group interviews, written protocols, and document analysis have been used to gather data. The negligible impact of local literature on literature studies, the low status of literature, and the lack of interest in literature as a course of study have led to the formulation of four basic premises that underpin the idea of how students in Singapore secondary schools approach literature. Theoretical, policy, and practice benefit from the findings that student' empirical research yields.

References

Ball, S., Kenny, A., & Gardiner, D. (1990). Literacy, Politics and the Teaching of English. In Goodson, I., & Medway, P. (Eds.), Bringing English to Order (pp. 47-86). London: The Falmer Press.

Chambers, E., & Gregory, M. (2006). Teaching and Learning English Literature. London: Sage Ltd.

Chew, K., & Wong, M.W. (1999). A Literature Syllabus for Secondary Schools in Singapore.

In Chua, S. H., & Chin, W. P. (Eds.), Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore (pp. 90-95). Singapore: National Institute of Education,Nanyang Technological University.

Choo, S. (2004). Investigating Ideology in the Literature curriculum in Singapore. Unpublished master’s thesis. Department of English Language and Literature: National University of Singapore.

Choo, S. (2011). On literature’s use(ful/less)ness: reconceptualising the literature curriculum in the age of globalisation. Journal of Curriculum Studies (Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 47-67). London: Routledge.

Curriculum Planning and Development Division. (2007). Literature in English, Teaching Syllabus. Ministry of Education: Singapore.

Goh, C. B., & Gopinathan, S. (2006). The Development of Education in Singapore since 1965. Background paper prepared for the Asia Education Study Tour for African Policy Makers, June 18 – 30. Retrieved July 8, 2007, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200- 1121703274255/1439264-1153425508901/Development_Edu_Singapore_draft.pdf

Goh, C.T. (1997). Speech at the opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking 2 June 1997.

Holden, P. (1999). The Great Literature Debate: Why Teach Literature in Singapore? In Chua, S.

H. & Chin, W. P. (Eds.), Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore (pp. 79-89). Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.

Holden, P. (2000). On the Nation's Margins: The Social Place of Literature in Singapore. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Volume: 15 Issue: 1 Page: 30.

Lee, B. Y. (2005). Minister For Information, Communications And The Arts, Speech At The Opening Of The School Of The Arts, 2 January 2008, 8:00am At 90 Goodman Road. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from

http://app.mica.gov.sg/Default.aspx?tabid=79&ctl=Details&mid=540&ItemID=181

Lee, H. L. (2010). National Day Rally speech 29 August 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2011, from http://www.pmo.gov.sg/content/pmosite/mediacentre/speechesninterviews/primeminister/201 0/August/national_day_rallyspeechenglishbyprimeministerleehsienloongon29a.html.

Lee, H. L. (2010). New Year Message 2011. Retrieved January 11, 2011, from http://www.pmo.gov.sg/content/pmosite/mediacentre/speechesninterviews/primeminister/201 0/December/prime_minister_snewyearmessage2011.html.

Lee, K. Y. (2009). The Fundamentals of Singapore’s Foreign Policy: Then and Now. Speech at the Rajaratnam Lecture 9 April 2009. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from

http://www.news.gov.sg/public/sgpc/en/media_releases/agencies/pmo/speech/S-20090409- 1.html.

Lui, T. Y. (2007). Gearing Up for the Future: Innovation in Singapore’s Education System. Speech at IBAP Teachers Conference 31 March 2007. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2007/sp20070331a.htm

McGregor, R. (1992). Imagining realities: values and literature. In Thomson, J. (Ed.), Reconstructing literature teaching: new essays on the teaching of literature (pp. 137- 148). Norwood SA: Australian Association for the Teaching of English.

Miller, H. (1998). Effects of Globalisation on Literary Study. Paper presented at conference on Literary History and Comparative Literary Studies, May 7 1998. Retrieved January 26, 2011, from

http://litteraturhistorie.au.dk/fileadmin/www.litteraturhistorie.au.dk/forskning/forskningspubli kationer/arbejdspapirer/arbejdspapir16.pdf

Miller, H. (2002). On Literature. London: Routledge.

Ministry of Education. (2007, May 22). MOE Selects First Five FutureSchools@Singapore [Press release]. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/2007/pr20070522_print.htm.

Ministry of Education. (2008, March 3). New School of Science and Technology to Open in 2010 [Press release]. Retrieved May 4, 2008, from

http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2008/03/new-school-of-science-and-tech.php.

Ministry of Education. (2011). Gifted Education Programme: Integrated Programme.

Retrieved January 30, 2011, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/programmes/gifted- education-programme/integrated-programmes.

Ministry of Education Corporate Brochure. (2010). Education in Singapore. Retrieved

October 12, 2010, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/about/files/moe-corporate-brochure.pdf

Ministry of Education. (2011). National Education (2011). Retrieved January 22, 2012, from

Ministry of Information and the Arts. (1999). Renaissance City Report: Culture and the Arts in Renaissance Singapore. Ministry of Information and the Arts, Singapore. Retrieved 20 January, 2010, from http://app.gov.sg/Portals/0/2_FinalRen.pdf.

Ministry of Manpower. (2010). Strategic Skills in Demand. Retrieved January 12, 2011, from http://www.mom.gov.sg/skills-training-and-development/skills-in-demand/Pages/skills-in- demand.aspx

National University of Singapore. (2010). Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. English Literature.

Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/prospective/faqs.html

Ng, Eng Hen. (2010). FY2010 Committee of Supply Debate: 1st Reply by Dr Ng Eng Hen,

Minister for Education and Second Minister for Defence on Strengthening Education for All. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2010/03/09/fy-2010-committee-of-supply-de.php.

O’Donoghue, T. (2007). Planning your qualitative research project: an introduction to interpretivist research in education. London; New York : Routledge.

O’Neill, M. (1995). Variant Readings: A Cross-Cultural Study of Reading Comprehension And Literacy Texts. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia.

Poon, A. (2007). The Politics of Pragmatism: Some Issues in the Teaching of Literature in Singapore. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education 14(1): 51-59. London: Routledge.

Poon, A. (2009). Introduction: 1990- present. In Poon, A., Holden, P., & Lim, S. (Eds.), Writing Singapore: An Historical Anthology of Singapore Literature (pp. 359-379). Singapore: NUS Press and National Arts Council of Singapore.

Poon, A. (2010). Constructing the Cosmopolitan Subject: Teaching Secondary School Literature in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30, (1), 31-41.

Rubdy, R. (2007). Singlish in the School: An Impediment or a Resource. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28, (4), 308-324.

Shanmugaratnam, T. (2005). Speech at National Arts Council’s Golden Point Award Night.

Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/speeches/2005/sp20050831a_print.htm Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: new directions in the Singapore school

system? Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 151-166.

Silver, R. E. (2004). The Discourse of Linguistic Capital: Language and Economic Policy Planning in Singapore. Journal of Language Policy, 4(1): 47-66.

Singh, K. (1999). Literature in the Singapore Curriculum: Challenges for the Future, in Chua, Seok Hong & Chin, Woon Ping (eds) Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore (pp. 62-67). Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.

The Straits Times. (1997). ‘Myopic’ to make students give up literature. 30 May 1997 (p. 53). Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings.

The Straits Times. (1997). Big drop in students studying O-level literature. 16 August 1997. p.77 Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings.

Velayutham, S. (2007). Responding to globalisation: nation, culture and identity in Singapore.Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Yeo, R. (1996). The Literature Curriculum, Literary Theory and Teaching in Singapore. NIECER Research Paper 17. Singapore: National Institute of Education.

Yeo, R. (1999). National Education and the Literature Curriculum in Singapore Schools. In Chua, S. H., & Chin, W. P. (Eds.), Localising Pedagogy: Teaching Literature in Singapore (pp. 68-78). Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University

Downloads

Published

2022-01-19

How to Cite

Murtdha Ayad Mohammed Dawood. (2022). LITERATURE IN ENGLISH STUDIES: A THEORY OF HOW TEACHERS AND STUDENTS WITH THE SUBJECT. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 3(1), 33-39. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejhea/article/view/1732

Issue

Section

Articles