PRINCIPLE OF CONTRARIO ACTUS IN EXECUTION OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT DECISIONS TO REALIZE LEGAL CERTAINTY IN INDONESIA

Authors

Muhammad Randhy Martadinata Doctoral Candidate. Jambi University Postgraduate – Indonesia

Keywords:

Principle of Contrario Actus, Execution, PTUN Decision

Abstract

Contrarius actus is an administrative law concept that states which state administrative officials who make state administrative decisions automatically have the authority to change, replace, revoke or cancel the documents they make. Non-compliance by TUN officials in applying the contrarius actus principle to PTUN decisions is a problem in this study. As an official with absolute authority to revoke or amend the decision, it should be attached to his position. The aim of this research is to determine the existence and analyze the strength of the executorial implementation of PTUN Judge Decisions in order to realize legal certainty in Indonesia. In this dissertation, the issues that will be discussed are First, what are the arrangements for the execution of State Administrative Court Decisions in Indonesia, Second, Is the application of the Contrario Actus Principle in the execution of State Administrative Court Decisions effective in order to realize legal certainty in Indonesia, Third, what is the executorial power? Decisions of judges at the State Administrative Court can create legal certainty for justice seekers in Indonesia. This research is normative juridical research, namely research that is focused on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law. The object of this research is positive law which regulates the existence of decisions of State Administrative Court judges in the context of realizing legal certainty. In this research, there are five main approaches used, namely: the legislative approach (Normative approach), the case approach, the Historical approach, the comparative approach and the conceptual approach. The results of this research are that, many of the arrangements for the execution of PTUN decisions are still not implemented because the execution arrangements in the State Administrative Court Law give rise to misunderstandings regarding the independence of judicial institutions. The application of the Contrario Actus Principle in the execution of State Administrative Court Decisions has not been effective in realizing legal certainty. In Indonesia, because there are no clear and specific regulations that state sanctions for Defendants who do not implement PTUN decisions, the legal awareness possessed by state administration officials in Indonesia is still quite low to obey in implementing PTUN Decisions, TUN Officials who do not comply PTUN's decision is a criminal act (Contempt of Court)

References

A’an Efendi dan Freddy Poernomo, Hukum Administrasi, Hukum Administrasi. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2019

Amar Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta Nomor 242/G/SPPU/2018/PTUN.JKT.

Amar Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jambi Nomor 35/G/2020/PTUN.JBI tertanggal 20 April 2021

Chakim Lutfi M, “Contrarius actus” Kamus Hukum, Majalah Konstitusi, Nomor 126, 2017

https:// www. academia. edu/ 39172629/ Konsekuensi_ Yuridis_ Terhadap_ Diabaikannya_ Pelaksaan_ Putusan_ Pengadilan_ Tata_Usaha_ Negara_ Yang_Telah _Memiliki_ Kekuatan_ Hukum_ Tetap diakses pada 19 Februari 2023.

https://sipp.ptun-jambi.go.id/index.php/detil_perkara diakses pada tanggal 15 Maret 2023.

https://www.malangtimes.com/baca/49535/20200228/134800/terbengkalai-6-tahun-ratusan-putusan-ptun-tak-dilaksanakan-ini-sanksinya diakses pada tangal 12 Maret 2023.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia http://www.docudesk.com. (Diakses pada Tanggal 19 Februari 2023 Februari 2023).

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, cet. Kedua, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2010

Muhammad Reza Winata, Politik Hukum Dan Konstitusionalitas Kewenangan Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Berbadan Hukum Oleh Pemerintah: Legal Policy and Constitutionality of Authority in Dissolution of Legally Registered Societal Organizations by the Government,

Moh. Dani Pratama, Tiga Putusan Pengadilan Berbeda tentang Calon Anggota DPD, Hukum Online, 19 November 2018, https:// www. Hukumonline .com /berita/ baca/ lt5bf27bca49b48/ tiga-putusan-pengadilan-berbedatentang-calon-anggota-dpd/ , diakses 12 Maret 2023.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Kedelapan, Kencana, Jakarta, 2013

Philipus M Hadjon, Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum Dogmatik (Normatif), dalam Yuridika, Nomor 6 Tahun IX, November-Desember 1994

Pasal 47 UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas UU No. 5 Tahun 1986.

Roscoe Pound, The Development of Constitutional Guarantees of liberty, Yale University Press, London, 1957, Halaman. 7 dikutip dari Moh. Mahfud MD, Politik Hukum Menuju Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional, disampaikan pada Seminar Arah Pembangunan Hukum Menurut UUD 1945 Hasil Amandemen yang diselenggarakan oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN) Departemen Hukum dan HAM tanggal 29-31 Mei 2006 di Mercure Ancol Hotel, Jakarta,

Saartje Sarah Alfons, Konsekuensi Yuridis Terhadap Diabaikannya Pelaksanan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Telah Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum Tetap, Jurnal SASI Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura Volume 24 Nomor 2, Juli Desember 2018:

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017, Ibid., Ps. 471 ayat (7) dan ayat (8), serta Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2017, Tata Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, BN No. 1442 Tahun 2017, Pasal 13 ayat (5) dan ayat (6).

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, LN No. 77 Tahun 1986, TLN No. 3344, Pasal. 115.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, Administrasi Pemerintahan, LN No. 292 Tahun 2014, TLN No. 5601, Pasal. 7 ayat (2) huruf l.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017, Pasal. 14 huruf n.

Yustinus Paat, Gugatan OSO, PTUN Terbitkan Surat Eksekusi, Berita Satu, 22 Janurai 2019, https:// www. beritasatu. com/yudo- dahono/ nasional/533883/gugatan-oso- ptun-terbitkan-surat-eksekusi , diakses 12 Maret 2023.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-07

How to Cite

Muhammad Randhy Martadinata. (2023). PRINCIPLE OF CONTRARIO ACTUS IN EXECUTION OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT DECISIONS TO REALIZE LEGAL CERTAINTY IN INDONESIA. European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability, 4(9), 9-15. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejrds/article/view/3824