THE EFFECT OF MAKE A MATCH TYPE OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL AND ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN INTEGRATED IPS LESSONS IN CLASS VIII SMP NEGERI 1 BOTUPINGGE BONE BOLANGO DISTRICT

Authors

  • Rahmat Akuba Master of Economic Education Study Program Gorontalo State University 2022
  • Fachrudin Zain Olilingo Master of Economic Education Study Program
  • Wenny Hulukati Master of Economic Education Study Program
  • Heldy Vanny Alam Master of Economic Education Study Program

Keywords:

Learning Outcomes, Make A Match, Achievement Motivation

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the cooperative learning model type make a match and achievement motivation on student learning outcomes in integrated social studies subjects in Class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Botupingge, Bone Bolango Regency. Sources of data in this study is primary data through the distribution of questionnaires to 51 respondents and learning outcomes tests to the research sample (students). The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression with the help of SPSS version 21. The results of this study indicate that (1) the Make a Match learning model has a positive and very significant effect on student learning outcomes in Integrated Social Studies subjects in class VIII Junior High School (SMP). ) Negeri 1 Botupingge, Bone Bolango Regency with a partial determination coefficient value of 29.60%. (2) Achievement motivation has a positive and very significant effect on student learning outcomes in Integrated Social Studies subjects in class VIII of State 1 Junior High School (SMP) Botupingge, Bone Bolango Regency with a partial determination coefficient value of 41.00%. (3) The Make a Match learning model and achievement motivation together have a very significant effect on student learning outcomes in Integrated Social Studies subjects in class VIII of State 1 Junior High School (SMP) Botupingge Bone Bolango Regency with a coefficient of determination (Adjusted R Square ) of 70.60%. While the remaining 70.60% is explained by other variables not examined in this study such as the role of tutors or peers, classroom management by the teacher, teacher competence, learning environment, emotional intelligence, intellectual intelligence, spiritual intelligence, teacher commitment, student personality, interest in learning and parental support from students

References

Ahmadi, Abu. 2003. Learning Psychology. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Anni, Catharina Tri. 2012. Psychology of Learning. Semarang : UPT UNNES. Press.

Ashar, Rayandra. 2012. Creative Developing Learning Media. Jakarta: Reference

Darsono. 2015. Learning and Learning. Semarang : IKIP Press.

Dasim Budimansyah and Suparlan. 2010. Pakem. Bandung: PT Genesindo.

Djamarah Syaiful Bahri. 2014. Teaching and Learning Strategy. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Djwondono, SEW. 2004 Educational psychology, Jakarta: PT Gramedia widiasarana Indonesia

Farisuci, R. M., Budiman, B., & Lukmawati, L. (2019). Achievement Motivation With Adversity Quotient in Madrasah Aliyah Students In Palembang City. Psychic: Journal of Islamic Psychology, 5(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v5i1.3195

Fudyartanto. (2002). Educational Psychology. Yogyakarta: Global Main Library

Hamalik, Omar. 2013. Teaching and Learning Process. Jakarta : PT. Earth Literature.

Intang, S. B. (2007). The Relationship between Reasoning Ability in Mathematics and Achievement Motivation on Mathematics Learning Achievement. Journal of Education and Culture, 1(069), 98–1003.

Isjoni. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Student Library

Junianto, D., & Wagiran, W. (2013). The effect of teacher teaching performance, parental involvement, self-actualization and achievement motivation on achievement. Journal of Vocational Education, 3(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i3.1845

M. Thobroni. 2017. Learning and Learning. Yogyakarta : Ar Ruzz Media

Majid, Abdul. 2017. Learning Strategies, Bandung. PT Teen RosdaKarya

Moh. Usman and Lilis Setiawati. 2001. Efforts to optimize teaching and learning activities. Bandung: PT Pemuda Rosdakarya.

Mulyatiningsih, Endang. 2011. Applied Research in Education and Engineering. Yogyakarta: UNY Press

Munandar, utami. 2004. Developing Talent and Creativity of School Children: Jakarta: Gramedia

Oemar Hamalik. 2008. Teaching Planning Based on a systems approach. PT Bumi Aksara

Prawiradilaga, Dewisalma. 2014. Insights on Educational Technology. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.

Rashid and Mansur. 2007. Assessment of Learning Outcomes. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima

Rusman. 2014. Learning Models (Developing Professionalism. Teachers). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudjana, Nana. 2005. Assessment of Teaching and Learning Outcomes. Bandung: PT Teen Rosdakarya

Suprijono, Agus. 2012. Cooperative Learning (PAIKEM Theory and Application). Surabaya: Student Library.

Umam, Khaerul. 2012. Organizational Management. Bandung: Faithful Library.

Uno, Hamzah and Lamatenggo, Nina. (2014). Learning Information & Communication Technology. Jakarta: Earth Literacy.

Usman, Husaini. 2013. Management Theory, Practice, and Educational Research. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara

Wahidpur, et al. 2010. Learning Evaluation. Yogyakarta: Nuha Litera.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-06

How to Cite

Rahmat Akuba, Fachrudin Zain Olilingo, Wenny Hulukati, & Heldy Vanny Alam. (2022). THE EFFECT OF MAKE A MATCH TYPE OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL AND ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN INTEGRATED IPS LESSONS IN CLASS VIII SMP NEGERI 1 BOTUPINGGE BONE BOLANGO DISTRICT. European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability, 3(6), 63-69. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejrds/article/view/2315

Issue

Section

Articles