CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AS A MECHANISM FOR DEVELOPING THE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF DEPUTY DIRECTORS FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Nurillo Jambilov Andijan State institute of Foreign Languages PhD student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17605/

Keywords:

continuous professional development, deputy director, academic affairs

Abstract

The quality of secondary education is closely related not only to the professional competence of teachers but also to the managerial, pedagogical, analytical, and leadership competence of school administrators. Among them, deputy directors for academic affairs hold a particularly important position because they coordinate the teaching-learning process, monitor curriculum implementation, support teachers methodologically, analyze educational outcomes, and participate in school improvement. In the context of educational reforms, their role is gradually shifting from routine administrative control to instructional leadership and evidence-based management. Therefore, continuous professional development may serve as an effective mechanism for developing their professional competence. This article examines the role of continuous professional development in improving the professional competence of deputy directors for academic affairs in secondary schools. The study is based on theoretical analysis, comparative review, and synthesis of competence-based, instructional leadership, and professional learning approaches. The article proposes a CPD model consisting of needs assessment, individual development planning, modular training, mentoring, school-based practice, monitoring, feedback, and reflective portfolio development. The findings suggest that CPD for deputy directors should be systematic, practice-oriented, collaborative, digitally supported, and connected with real school improvement tasks.

 

References

1. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons.

2. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development.

Learning Policy Institute.

3. Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2016). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust.

4. Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass.

5. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and

Practice, 8(3), 381–391.

6. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The

Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.

7. Learning Forward. (2022). Standards for professional learning. Learning Forward.

8. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1),

1–14.

9. OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing.

10. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). On the approval of the National Program for the Development of School

Education in 2022–2026. Presidential Decree No. PF-134.

11. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley

& Sons.

12. UNESCO. (2024). Global Education Monitoring Report 2024/5: Leadership in education: Lead for learning.

UNESCO.

13. Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik

(Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Hogrefe & Huber.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles