DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE OF COMPOST STIRRING MACHINE AND EVALUATION OF ITS OPERATION
Keywords:
Compost Stirring Machine, Compost density, Fuel consumptionAbstract
Several experiments were conducted to evaluate the mechanical performance and the quality indicators of the compost manufactured for the machine using three rotational speeds (750, 1500, and 2250) min-1 cycle. Three times the compost is turned over a month, which is once, twice, and three times. The results showed that the rotational speed of 2250 rpm-1 had the lowest compost density and compost maturity time and the highest rate of disintegration, fuel consumption and productivity of the machine compared to the rest of the speeds. Also, treatment of three times of stirring per month gave less compost density and compost maturation time and the highest rate of disintegration, fuel consumption and productivity of the machine compared to stirring once and stirring twice.
References
Al-Hashem, H. A.; S. K. Abbouda and M. O. Saeed (2000). The effect of Rear wheel Track Width and Working depth on Performance of A2WD tractor. Res. Bult. No (93), Res. Cent. Coll. Of Agri., King Saud Univ., (5-21).
Al-Mashhadani, K. A. K. and O. M. J. Al-Qassab (2017). Common designs and analysis of their experiences with Genstat software. First edition. Baghdad University.
Bhaisare, S. H.; P. Walke; D. S. S. Ganguly and V.M. Wankar (2017). The Organic Compost Machine and Factors Effecting Performance of Composting: A Review. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing. Vol. 7(12): 15866 – 15870.
Bouissa, A., Yasser A. H. and H. Salman (2015). Assessment of maturity and stability of compost prepared from the residues of protected tomato cultivation in the Syrian coast. Tishreen University Journal of Research and Scientific Studies. Volume 37 (1): 247-263.
Fouda, T. Z. (2009). Effect of kinematic parameter on some performance indices for the self-propelled compost turning machine. Misr J. Ag. Eng., Vol. 26(1): 56- 68.
Guerra, R. E.; M. Vazquez and M. D. Ravina (2001). Dynamics of physicochemical and biological parameters during the co composting of chestnut burr/leaf litter with solid poultry manure. JSci Food Agric 2001; 81: 648-52.
Inbar, Y.; Chen Y. and Hadar Y. (1990). Humic substances formed during
the composting of organic matter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. Vol. 54, 1316–1323.
Jackson M. L. (1958). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffe N J. pp 151-153 and 331-334.
Lasaridi K.; Protopapa I.; Kotsou M.; Pilidis G.; Manios T. and
Kyriacou A. (2006). Quality assessment of composts in the Greek market: The need for standards and quality assurance. J. Environ Manage Vol. 80: 58-65.
Morad , M . M; A . F. Abdel Mottaleb and T. Z. Fouda (2008). Manufacture and performance evaluation of a Self-Propelled compost turning machine. Misr J. Ag. Eng., Vol. 25(4): 1478-1492.
Ntougias S.; Ehaliotis C.; Papadopoulou K. K. and Zervakis G. (2006). Application of respiration and FDA hydrolysis measurements for estimating microbial activity during composting processes. Bio Fertile Soils. Vol. 42: 330-7
Richards, L. A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. USDA Agric Handbook 60, 1954, Washington DC.
Stevenson, F. J. (1982). Humus chemistry genesis, composition, reactions,
Department of agronomy, University of Illinois, 443pNew York, USA John Wiley & sons, Ink.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.